Posted in: Fox, Legal, DRM, Piracy & IP, News, YouTube by Chris Tew on December 9, 2006

8 People Are Speaking Their Mind


  1. Your argument is wrong. Period.

    Pirating is wrong. Period.

    If you do not like the price of a DVD or the manner in which it is distributed, then don’t buy it. If no one buys it, the distributor will change so they can make money. It belongs to them. It does not belong to you. I’m sure you’d be pretty upset if you made something so that you could sell it and make some money to feed you and your family and along comes someone that copies it and gives it away.

    Too many people want everything for nothing. Lazy people have no purpose.

  2. Chris Tew Says:

    March 27th, 2007 at 3:50 am
  3. Donald Ballard Says:

    March 18th, 2008 at 8:32 am

    I just finished reading your post on linking. I had never heard of this before. So, to make sure I do not link to any information I am not allowed to link to, I will seek permission to do so. I contacted one huge website and got UNLIMITED linking to massive information that is definitely relevant to my website.

    You cover the subject well.

    Thanks, Donald Ballard

  4. i’m very curious as the the contributory infringement policies of canada and how they deal with cases of embedding youtube videos… I figured it was legal because my site isn’t actually hosting any illegal files.. this contributory infringement thing is bad bad news, but maybe in canada i’m… safer?

  5. I do not know about Canadian laws, but simply embedding videos from YouTube is unlikely to get you into trouble.

    If you embed a video from YouTube you can only assume that when it was uploaded the user abided by YouTube’s ToS and had rights to the video. If you are asked by the copyright holder to remove the video and do so then in the U.S you are protected under the DMCA.

    However, systematically embedding prated vids and replacing removed vids with fresh ones to build a directory of pirated content is another matter.

    That’s my opinion on the matter anyway.

  6. copyright is the sole problem..if i pay for cable i viewed it it should be mine..i did pay for it ..right…if not can i sue my cable provider for providing me with copyrighted material..lets get sue happy america lets take down comcast att fox or any one who provides us with the material we are getting sued for

  7. In the end, these websites help a show out a lot more then they hurt it. I know many of my users are from all differant parts of the world.. Places that would never get to see the show on tv, and probably can not afford the expensive dvd’s. Also qaulity really isnt that great, so it encourages the users to buy the actual dvd’s and products. I actually have many links on my site that refer the user to the official online store for that show. I am by no means trying to hurt the company, just exercising my rights and please hundreds of thousands.

  8. Infact, many networks have talked about the positive effects of tv streaming sites and online videos of their show (Viacom being one of them). South Park for example gained its popularity online, it would never be what it is today without the help of the internet and tv sites.

    If a company goes through the trouble of sueing these people who are morally doing nothing wrong at all, they are doing the complete opposite of what will please the show’s fans.

    You don’t want your viewers to start hating the makers of the show, and shutting down one of their favorite methods of watching it is a good way to do that.

Have Your Say

Ask a Question Or Offer Your 2 Cents:

Return to the full post




Keep up to date with Web TV, Video and IPTV News:

Subscribe to Web TV Wire by Email
Subscribe to Web TV Wire via RSS