Comments on: Viacom Vs. YouTube | $1 Billion Lawsuit Takes Another Twist – Judge Orders User Histories

By: Bo

Bo — Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:01:37 +0000

Just another infringement on our ammendment rights to eventually institute martial law. This isnt about copyright infringement though they want you to think it is. It’s another small step in a big plan. But God will eventually trump those plans and probably sooner than many people think. The signs are there and prophecies are being fulfilled. If you Believe God and His Word, just read the books of Revelation and Daniel. And While your at it, research Prince Charles of Wales and his Coat of Arms. Also check out what’s happening with the magnetosphere and how that has severely impacted the irradic weather and natural disasters. Do it quick before viacom steals your liberties. LOL

By: Shawn Sommers

Shawn Sommers — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 07:21:37 +0000

this is a violation of “The Privacy act of 1974″.The Privacy Act prohibits the disclosure of information from a system of records without the written consent of the subject individual, Viacom can not use this unless the have provided with advanced, adequate written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable. Every Ip address is a registered personal property of the individual. Without written permission or agreement this can not be substantiated evidence for them to use against anyone, including youtube

By: jam

jam — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:37:23 +0000

i swear these people are just plain stupid.i mean why would anyone make it their business to see youtube destroyed and failed.its wrong,i mean who cares about copyrights as long as their not airing the show by themselves or something.its not really stealing.its posting things for enjoyment of the people.also,viacom should thank youtube because they are advertising their shows and junk.and i think its a pile of bs if they think they can send millions of people to jail for watching a video.

By: Aro2220

Aro2220 — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 14:31:38 +0000

I don’t understand how a free and democratic system can suffer protecting large corporations against technological progress by attacking its consumers.

The rights of the people should always preceed the rights of a company.

By: TRUTH

TRUTH — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:18:00 +0000

If the Public do not take control of old TV shows, commercials etc they get lost.
Countless programs from the 50s, 60s and 70s have been lost over time, destroyed by TV stations, or simly lost in accidents like the recent fires at Universal Studios.
The studios greedily hang on to this rare material and eventually lose it. Thank god, out of the millions of people on earth some people are mindful enough to save and store this material and share it with us.
I put to you that if any free to air programs have incorporated advertising, then it becomes public domain. The advertisers have paid for it.

If I have seen a TV show it has gone into my brain. I own it. I had to be brainwashed by the commercials to see it, I earned it.

Music Publishers and Major Studios are on the brink of their downfall. The thinking public is now capable of much more engaging material. If they think they can send us ALL to jail there will be no one left to buy their outdated and mindless garbage.

WE DID NOT SIGN ANY CONTRACTS WITH THEM. They forced this stuff on us, and ripped off the players and creators in the process. They made up their own ridiculous copyright rules with the power of the almighty dollar.
The law is there to protect the people, NOT THE MONEY.

By: e thomas

e thomas — Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:33:44 +0000

The top brass at google must have shit for brains if they didn’t
realise that youtube was infringing copyright laws but that is
why google paid a hansome price for youtube is because
they thought they could get away with it and of course google
could of filtered the copyright material on youtube but what
does’t surprize me is that google are not prepared to take the
rap but are more than willing to drop all there users into a
meat grinder as there is the technology for google to save
youtube and it is in the form of Blinkx a company that can
tag copyrighted material for before it is seen so the obvious
solution for google would be to either use Blinkx.com technology
or just buy the company.