<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiTV &#124; Sneak Preview With Screenshots &#8211; Better than Joost?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/</link>
	<description>The Business of Internet Television and Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:15:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Online PR</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-20517</link>
		<dc:creator>Online PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-20517</guid>
		<description>Great stuff and information on these features including some pretty screenshot

Thx for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff and information on these features including some pretty screenshot</p>
<p>Thx for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tew</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-11026</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-11026</guid>
		<description>Penny: wwitv and witv are different products</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penny: wwitv and witv are different products</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-10923</link>
		<dc:creator>penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-10923</guid>
		<description>I watch wwitv.  They show the same five science fiction movies over and over again. They NEED CONTENT.

On the other hand, they do have a link to classic arts tv---and that is worth its weight!!!!

That is basically what I watch on wwitv--and I am quite grateful for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch wwitv.  They show the same five science fiction movies over and over again. They NEED CONTENT.</p>
<p>On the other hand, they do have a link to classic arts tv&#8212;and that is worth its weight!!!!</p>
<p>That is basically what I watch on wwitv&#8211;and I am quite grateful for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blognation Italy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is WiTV, A Serious Joost Competitor, Disadvantaged By Location?</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-10214</link>
		<dc:creator>blognation Italy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is WiTV, A Serious Joost Competitor, Disadvantaged By Location?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-10214</guid>
		<description>[...] WiTV, as opposed to Babelgum, is heading straight for the lion’s den and aiming to tackle Joost head on for the attention of the media companies. However there are some vital differences in the technology behind the service. Rather than opting for P2P technology, WiTV has chosen to distribute its content from a central server and it has developed the service as a browser based application which users will not need to download (unless they want to, in which case that option is also available). For me, this is already a winning point in terms of usability. WiTV got a sneak preview with some great imagery on Web TV Wire: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WiTV, as opposed to Babelgum, is heading straight for the lion’s den and aiming to tackle Joost head on for the attention of the media companies. However there are some vital differences in the technology behind the service. Rather than opting for P2P technology, WiTV has chosen to distribute its content from a central server and it has developed the service as a browser based application which users will not need to download (unless they want to, in which case that option is also available). For me, this is already a winning point in terms of usability. WiTV got a sneak preview with some great imagery on Web TV Wire: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webxplorers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WiTV</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-9176</link>
		<dc:creator>webxplorers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WiTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-9176</guid>
		<description>[...] WebTV Wire has the scoop on a new IPTV outfit called, WiTV. Interestingly they&#8217;ve opted for a centralised content delivery model they call CrossCast rather than P2P. How they plan to get this to scale will be very interesting. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WebTV Wire has the scoop on a new IPTV outfit called, WiTV. Interestingly they&#8217;ve opted for a centralised content delivery model they call CrossCast rather than P2P. How they plan to get this to scale will be very interesting. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Clerks &#187; Browser-based WiTV video player gets sneak preview</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-9153</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Clerks &#187; Browser-based WiTV video player gets sneak preview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-9153</guid>
		<description>[...] Filed under: Portable Video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Filed under: Portable Video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Clerks &#187; WiTV to Offer More Chat and Download Options than Joost?</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-9152</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadget Clerks &#187; WiTV to Offer More Chat and Download Options than Joost?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-9152</guid>
		<description>[...] Read a first hand review at WebTVWire. Thanks for the heads up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read a first hand review at WebTVWire. Thanks for the heads up. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadgets Galore - Updates on all the latest gadgets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Browser-based WiTV video player gets sneak preview</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-9000</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadgets Galore - Updates on all the latest gadgets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Browser-based WiTV video player gets sneak preview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-9000</guid>
		<description>[...] Filed under: Portable Video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Filed under: Portable Video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LenchoGanas</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-8963</link>
		<dc:creator>LenchoGanas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-8963</guid>
		<description>Es exelente el nuevo sistema de TV por internet que quieren utilizar, esperemos y sea algo sencillo, de buena calidad, y sobre todo gratuito jeje, saludos de MEXICO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Es exelente el nuevo sistema de TV por internet que quieren utilizar, esperemos y sea algo sencillo, de buena calidad, y sobre todo gratuito jeje, saludos de MEXICO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WiTv, better than Joost and other free video companies? &#171; Mega Voltage</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/comment-page-2/#comment-8262</link>
		<dc:creator>WiTv, better than Joost and other free video companies? &#171; Mega Voltage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/witv-sneak-preview-with-screenshots-better-than-joost/#comment-8262</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out a full list of details over at: http://www.webtvwire.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out a full list of details over at: <a href="http://www.webtvwire.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.webtvwire.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
