<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Google Charge For YouTube Uploads? &#124; Profit-Making Alternative To Video Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webtvwire.com/should-google-charge-for-youtube-uploads-profit-making-alternative-to-video-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/should-google-charge-for-youtube-uploads-profit-making-alternative-to-video-advertising/</link>
	<description>The Business of Internet Television and Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:07:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Wescott</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvwire.com/should-google-charge-for-youtube-uploads-profit-making-alternative-to-video-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-126724</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Wescott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvwire.com/?p=6703#comment-126724</guid>
		<description>We had a similar problem with a TV network called Worship, in the early 1990&#039;s.  The programming was valuable and brought comfort and entertainment to a lot of people, but was a huge cash drain.  We monitized it by offer 12 hours a day to direct response marketing companies.  Youtube could do the same.  Offer direct marketing companies space for a revenue share.  Set very thing up through google, especially the money.  People see something they buy it through google and google credits the advertiser less their share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a similar problem with a TV network called Worship, in the early 1990&#8217;s.  The programming was valuable and brought comfort and entertainment to a lot of people, but was a huge cash drain.  We monitized it by offer 12 hours a day to direct response marketing companies.  Youtube could do the same.  Offer direct marketing companies space for a revenue share.  Set very thing up through google, especially the money.  People see something they buy it through google and google credits the advertiser less their share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
